000			01748cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS49223
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u70397
041			_aeng
245			_aSutton LBC v Bolton and another
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1993) 33 EG 91-93(3)
520			_aChD 3 February 1993. The plaintiffs (S) were the freeholders of 1.5 acres of land. The conveyance of 1950 had been subject to various restrictive covenants which included one that stating that not more than one house could be built per acre. B were treated as entitled to the benefit of the covenant. In 1981 S decided to discontinue the property`s current use and sell the house and land. Outline planning permission was obtained for the erection of 10 detached two storey houses. Following B`s claim to the benefit of the restricted covenants S passed a resolution that pursuant to Local Government Act 1972 s122 the house should be `appropriated from social services to planning purposes`. S hoped this would mean they benefited from Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s127 which provides for the overriding of easements and other rights on land which have been appropiated by a local authority for planning purposes. B contended that S had to show they had acquired the land for some purpose co
650			_aCHILDRENS HOME
650			_aLOCLA GOVERNMENT ACT 1972 S122
650			_aLONDON GOVERNMENT ACT 1963
650			_aOUTLINE PLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aRESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 S127
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S237
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c44267 _d44267