000			01464cab a2200181 4500
001			ABS37880
008			090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u7358
041			_aeng
245			_aR v Valuation Officer, ex parte High Park Investments Ltd
260			_c1987
350			_a0
490			_aRating & Valuation Reporter _v27(4) June 1987, 84-86
520			_aQBD 18 February 1987. Application for judicial review to make an order of certiorari to quash a direction to enter the valuation of 3-7 Herbal Hill, London EC1 in the valuation list . The VO made his proposal in June 1979 to include 3-7 Herbal Hill as a car park at a rateable value of 1,075. The proposal was addressed at the time to Nyfil & Co, 4-6 Hatton Garden, as it was assumed that this company was the occupier of the car park. It was argued by the applicant (H), that at the time Nyfil & Co was not the owner or occupier of 3-7 Herbal Hill and 4-6 Hatton Garden was not the trading or any address of either Nyfil & Co or H; it was accepted that Nyfil was an associated company. It was claimed that by not sending the proposal to add the car park to the valuation list, H was denied the opportunity of objecting to the proposal before the lvc. QBD held that H had no case to challenge the proposal, made nearly eight years before. The company had been ignorant of the correct court for maki
690			_aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c4437 _d4437