000			00951cab a2200181 4500
001			WB2622-40
008			090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u70799
041			_aeng
245			_aRent Act 1977
260			_c1990
350			_a0
490			_aEGCS _v1990 73
520			_aIn Steele and another v McMahon and another , CA 23 May 1990, it was held that the balance of the premium did fall within one of the exceptions to Rent Act 1977 s120 , The exception concerned any expenditure incurred by the assignor in carrying out alterations or providing fixtures. The plaintiffs contention that the expenditure was incurred before the assignors became tenants by the grant of the lease and therefore the exception did not apply was wrong. It was necessary that the expenditure had to be incurred by the assignors only after they became tenants.
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c44582 _d44582