000			01001cab a2200193 4500
001			WB2622-44
008			090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u70819
041			_aeng
245			_aPlanning gain
260			_c1990
350			_a0
490			_aEGCS _v1990 74
520			_aIn Safeway properties Ltd v SoS for the Environment and another, QBD 22 May 1990, the application was dismissed on the grounds that the reasoning and application of the advice on DOE Circular 22/83 to the circumstances of the instant case could not be faulted. The inspector considered each of the tests for reasonableness and on the information before him he found against the applicants on all five tests in the circular. He was entitled to do so and to find that the need for the proposed traffic management measures did not arise wholly or substantially from the new development.
650			_aCASE LAW
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c44601 _d44601