000			01188cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS49518
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u71673
041			_aeng
245			_aCIL Securities Ltd v Briant Champion Long
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1993) 42 EG 281-286(6)
520			_aChD 5 February 1993. The defendants (B) were appointed to negotiate rent reviews in respect of four properties. They gave advice about the appropriate rent levels but subsequently the appellants (C) claimed the levels settled with their tenants were below the market levels which could have been obtained if referred to arbitration or an expert. C claimed damages. C`s claim was "held" as B did not show the required degree of care and diligence in reviewing comparable evidence.
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
650			_aCOMPARABLES
650			_aMARKET RENTS
650			_aNEGLIGENCE
650			_aRENT REVIEWS
650			_aVALUERS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c45218 _d45218