000			01593cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS49523
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u71691
041			_aeng
245			_aV G Fraulo & Co Ltd v Papa
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1993) 39 EG 129-132(4)
520			_aCA 8 March 1993. The plaintiff, F, was the owner of a building and entered into a reciprocal housing agreement with the local authority by which they agreed to rehouse the basement-flat tenant and F agreed, that on completion of specified works, the council could nominate a new tenant for the flat on a protected tenancy. The defendant, P, was nominated. In March 1986, without F`s authority, F`s surveyor gave P the key to the flat knowing that she would move in and commence occupation. F`s solicitors sent two letters to P one an open letter, stating that occupation was unlawful and requiring possession and one marked `without prejudice` offering a shorthold tenancy upon which grant could be back dated. P agreed to this in a telephone conversation however she did not sign any agreement nor pay any rent. In the possession hearing it was held that the telephone conversation and without prejudice letter were admissable and dismissed F`s claim. F appealed and this was allowed on the ground
650			_aPROTECTED TENANCY
650			_aRECIPROCAL HOUSING AGREEMENT
650			_aSHORTHOLD TENANCY
650			_aWITHOUT PREJUDICE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c45230 _d45230