| 000 | 00963cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2819-68 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u7483 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aGreen belt development | ||
| 260 | _c1992 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1992 EGCS 64(1) (9 May 1992) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses "Good and another v Epping Forest DC", ChD 14 April 1992, which concerned a premises bound by a s52 agreement imposing the condition that occupation was to be limited to persons wholly or mainly employed in agriculture. | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL OCCUPANCY | ||
| 650 | _aGREEN BELT | ||
| 650 | _aOCCUPANCY CONDITIONS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING CONDITIONS | ||
| 650 | _aSECTION 52 AGREEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 S52 | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106 | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c4525 _d4525 |
||