000			01648cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS49561
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u71808
041			_aeng
245			_aRicci v Masons (a firm)
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1993) 38 EG 154-159(6)
520			_aQBD 21 April 1993. By a lease dated March 1979 the plaintiff, R, was granted a term of 10 years on restaurant premises. The lease had a break clause providing for six months notice to terminate if the premises were required for redevelopment. In April 1988 a notice was served under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s25 terminating the tenancy but notifying R that it would not oppose the grant of a new tenancy. The defendant solicitors, M, failed to apply for this new tenancy on R`s behalf but admitted liability. Terms for a new tenancy were agreed for a five year period with another redevelopment clause but excluding the protection of the 1954 Act. R claimed that his intention was to sell any term he would have been granted. He had hoped to get 20 years with some prospect of renegotiating the break clause and wished this to be used to assess damages. It was held that R was likely to have been granted a 10 year lease under the Act with a six month redevelopment break clause. R was entitled
650			_aBREAK CLAUSE
650			_aDAMAGES
650			_aEXTENSION OF LEASE
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S25
650			_aNEGLIGENCE
650			_aTERMINATION OF TENANCY
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c45301 _d45301