| 000 | 01240cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS49572 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u71836 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBrennan (VO) v LLoyds Bank plc | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating Appeals _v1993 RA 99-112(8) |
||
| 520 | _aLT 14 July 1993, A suburban bank was assessed, pursuant to a decision of a valuation tribunal, at £16,325 rateable value. The VA sought an increase to £17,000. The arguement arose as to the valuation of the basement containing three stores and a strongroom. The VO in his primary valuation applied £27 psm to the net storgae area plus an addition for the strong room, based on his perception of demand and its effect on rental value, o £45psm. His secondary valuation was based on £18 psm and a spot figure of £300 for the additional value of the strong room. The ratepayers valuation was based on £18 psm with no distinction between the stores and the srongroom. The LT accepted the VO opinion. | ||
| 650 | _aBANKS | ||
| 650 | _aRATEABLE VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aSTRONG ROOMS | ||
| 650 |
_aValuation _96273 |
||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c45316 _d45316 |
||