| 000 | 00844cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2446-44 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u72211 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRecovery of service charges | ||
| 260 | _c1988 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1988 EGCS 150 |
||
| 520 | _aIn Laimond Property Investment Ltd v Arlington Park Mansions Ltd , CA 4 November 1988, it was held that the parties had expressly agreed how the outgoings and service charges would be apportioned, and they agreed the sum determined by the managing agents . The vendors could therefore not seek to recover the disputed charges after completion date as they were clearly within clause 22 of their sale agreement . | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c45589 _d45589 |
||