| 000 | 01210cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS49825 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u72881 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aInntrepreneur Estates (GL) Ltd v Boyes & others | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9347) 27 November 1993, 140-146(7) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 28 July 1993. B were assignees of a public house lease, which tied the defendants to purchasing certain drinks from the landlord (I). The rent was reviewed following suspension of some of these terms. B failed to pay rent and I claimed possession and arrears. B`s defence that the tie provisions were not severable, the lease was in breach of Article 85(2) of the Treaty of Rome, and that the rent should therefore be lower was accepted by the High Court. I appealed. Appeal allowed, the tie clauses were clearly severable, and their invalidity did not jeopardise the lease and its rent. | ||
| 650 | _aIMPLIED PERIODIC TENANCY | ||
| 650 | _aLEASES | ||
| 650 | _aMESNE PROFITS | ||
| 650 | _aPUB LEASES | ||
| 650 | _aPUBS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c46063 _d46063 |
||