| 000 | 00903cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2350-19 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u72946 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aNo breach of planning conditions | ||
| 260 | _c1987 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aDaily Telegraph _v15/12/87 p5 |
||
| 520 | _aA couple who purchased a Lake District home under planning conditions which stated occupation should be "by a person employed in the locality , a person employed in agriculture , a person employed in forestry", were found not guilty of breaching the conditions because they contended the comma after the word "locality" created three classes of potential owner, one being those employed locally. | ||
| 650 | _aLAKE DISTRICT SPECIAL PLANNING BOARD | ||
| 650 | _aOCCUPANCY CONDITIONS | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c46111 _d46111 |
||