| 000 | 01080cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS49878 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u73157 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aJalota and another v Hawkswood (VO) | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aRating Appeals _v(1993) RA 224-228(3) |
||
| 520 | _aLT 13 August 1993. An appeal by J against assessment of his shop`s rateable value on the grounds of nuisance from neighbouring agricultural activity, lack of garage and store, crime and vandalism and poor location. H argued that these factors were taken into account, were unverifiable or irrelevant, and the comparables cited were not valid. LT expressed sympathy for J`s circumstances but considered that only the claim of inferior location could be accepted and consequently reduced the valuation by 5%. | ||
| 650 | _aASSESSMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aCORNER SHOP | ||
| 650 | _aDISABILITIES | ||
| 650 | _aRATING APPEALS | ||
| 650 | _aREDUCTION | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c46267 _d46267 |
||