000			01714cab a2200301 4500
001			ABS49893
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u73232
041			_aeng
245			_aAmego Litho Ltd v Scanway Ltd
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1994) 02 EG 110-112(3)
520			_aChD 26 March 1993. Following a reference to determine a rent review the arbitrator made his award of £332,700pa based on a rental value in relation to the net internal area of £12.07. The tenant appealed under Arbitration Act 1979 s1 to set aside the award under Arbitration Act 1950 s23 on the grounds that the arbitrators conclusion was contradicted when stating that he relied on a comparable whose rental value was £10.40. He had also disregarded improvements on the grounds that this did not affect the rental value. Held that there was no error in law by the arbitrator within the principles of "Edwards v Bairstow" even if he was at error in handling the comparables however his award was set aside and he was dismissed on the grounds that he had misconducted the proceedings by rejecting evidence put forward by the tenant notwithstanding that the evidence could have been objected to by the landlord, and was not, as inadmissible evidence.
650			_aARBITRATION ACT 1950 S23
650			_aARBITRATION ACT 1979 S1
650			_aARBITRATORS' AWARDS
650			_aCOMPARABLES
650			_aEVIDENCE
650			_aINADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE
650			_aMISCONDUCT
650			_aRENT REVIEWS
650			_aRENTAL VALUE
690			_aARBITRATION-CASE LAW
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c46311 _d46311