000			01011cab a2200229 4500
001			WB2815-33
008			090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u73239
041			_aeng
245			_aRent Acts
260			_c1992
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1992 EGCS 45(2) (4/4/92)
520			_a"Ridehalgh v Horsefield and another" CA 26 March 1992. The defendants who had been tenants for over three years disputed a notice to quit and a summons for possession. At first instance the question was whether a shorthold notice had been served. On appeal, the tenants contention that proceedings for possession had to be commenced not later than three months after expiry of the notice, was upheld.
650			_aHOUSING ACT 1980 S55
650			_aPROTECTED SHORTHOLD TENANCIES
650			_aRENT ACT 1977 SCH15 CASE 19
650			_aSHORTHOLD TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c46315 _d46315