| 000 | 01027cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS50007 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u73620 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aEdwards, M. | ||
| 245 | _aDecisions : a sufficient interest | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9403) 22 January 1994, 126-127(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses "R v Canterbury CC ex parte Springimage Ltd" (1993) which considered the position of "locus standi" in relation to judicial review, the meaning and importance of Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s54a and the scope of s106 of the Act. | ||
| 650 | _aDOE CIRCULAR 16/1991 | ||
| 650 | _aLOCUS STANDI | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING OBLIGATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aSEWERAGE SYSTEM | ||
| 650 | _aSUPREME COURT ACT 1981 | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106 | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S54A | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE | ||
| 700 | _aMartin, J. | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c46501 _d46501 |
||