000			01469cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS50019
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u73687
041			_aeng
245			_aEdwards (PG) v SoS Environment and Roadside Developments Ltd and Breckland DC
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v1993 66 PCR 393-409(9)
520			_aQBD 10 May 1993. Following road improvements DTp recognised the need for new motorist service areas. Seven applications for planning permission were made. E`s proposal was sited at an interchange to cater for traffic in both directions; R`s was for two sites on either side of the road. B refused all applications and an appeal was made. The inspector held that decisions should be made by written representation. The decision favoured R`s appeal; need for a service area outweighed the detrimental effect on the character of the area. Local authorities relied on this to support refusal of the other competing sites. E objected on the grounds that all the sites should have been taken into account and been dealt with together. Upheld by the court. All alternative proposals should have been considered.
650			_aMOTORIST SERVICE AREAS
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aROAD IMPROVEMENTS
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S288
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c46530 _d46530