000			01384cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS50020
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u73694
041			_aeng
245			_aWycombe DC v Michael Shanly Group Ltd
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1994) 02 EG 112-114(3)
520			_aQBD 12 July 1993. M was owner occupier of some land. He gave no express consent to the display of advertising hoardings on his land by X although there had been negotiations between them. On realising that X had erected the hoardings M removed them. It was concluded that the hoarding was erected without M`s knowledge or consent and M was not guilty of the offence of displaying an advertisement under Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s224(5). W appealed on the grounds that not knowing about the advertisement was insufficient defence. Appeal dismissed citing "Merton LBC v Edmonds" (WB2926-35) which had held that not giving consent to an advertisement was a suitable defence under the Act.
650			_aADVERTISING HOARDINGS
650			_aADVERTISEMENT REGULATIONS
650			_aKNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT
650			_aMERTON LBC V EDMONDS
650			_aPLANNING CONTROL
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S224(5)
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c46532 _d46532