000			01647cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS50037
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u73781
041			_aeng
245			_aNational Schizophrenia Fellowship v Ribbles Estates SA and others
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1994) 03 EG 132-136(5)
520			_aChD 18 February 1993. In March 1991 N, a registered charity, purchased property previously adminstered by the health authority on behalf of the SoS Health. The SoS acquired the property in March 1983 from the first defendant. By a clause in the conveyance the purchaser covenanted that `no noisy, offensive or dangerous trade or pursuit shall be carried on in the property hereby conveyed nor any trade or pursuit which may be or become in any way a nuisance, annoyance or danger to the vendor or its successors in title or to the owners or occupiers of any neighbouring property which may tend to depreciate the value of the property`. N`s proposal was to provide accommodation for 12 people who had suffered from mental illness but whose condition had stabilised on medication. N sought a declaration that this was not a breach of the restrictive covenant. It was held that the proposed use would not cause a nuisance within the meaning of the clause. The words of the covenant were not wide enou
650			_aBREACH OF COVENANT
650			_aCARE IN THE COMMUNITY
650			_aHALFWAY HOUSE
650			_aRESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
650			_aVENDOR AND PURCHASER
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c46573 _d46573