000			01669cab a2200277 4500
001			ABS50049
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u73851
041			_aeng
245			_aHood and another v National Farmers` Union
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1994) 01 EG 109-115(7)
520			_aCA 21 April 1993. In September 1983 the plaintiff (H), who had owned a dairy farm in Wiltshire, bought a farm in Oxfordshire which had not been used for dairy purposes for ten years. The milking herd was moved in April 1984 and they received a provisional assessment of primary milk quota calculated on the basis of milk production at the Wiltshire farm but not on the Oxfordshire one. The Dairy Produce Quota Tribunal dismissed their claim for a development claim and an exceptional hardship claim for quota. H claimed that the defendant`s (N) had failed to advise them that they had a right to challenge the tribunal`s decision. N claimed that the judge had misconstrued the 1984 regulations, made finding contrary to the weight of evidence and misinterpreted his role in assessing his loss. Appeal dismissed on grounds that N had been in breach of a duty of care in failing to advise H as the tribunal had been wrong in its conclusions.
650			_aDAIRY PRODUCE QUOTA REGULATIONS 1984
650			_aDUTY OF CARE
650			_aREGULATION (EEC) 804/84
650			_aREGULATION (EEC) 856/84
650			_aEXCEPTIONAL HARDSHIP
650			_aMILK QUOTAS
650			_aNATIONAL FARMERS UNION
650			_aNEGLIGENCE
690			_aRURAL PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c46613 _d46613