000			01716cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS52353
008			090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u74398
041			_aeng
245			_aR v Thurrock BC ex parte Blue Circle Industries plc
260			_c1995
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1995) 65 PCR 79-86(8)
520			_aCA 16 September 1994. In 1981-1982 B sought planning permission for winning and working of clay and for refilling and reinstatement of the site. The borough council (T) implied to the county council that they would object to any method of infilling except a process called high-density baling. On the basis of this planning permission was granted in 1983. This had no specific reference to high-density baling but required any refuse to be compacted by means previously agreed with the minerals planning authority. In 1991 B sought to be released from this requirement. T refused to agree unless money was paid over by the applicant. B sought judicial review of that decision which was allowed. T`s appeal was dismissed on the grounds that the issue between the parties was whether agreement and variation sought by B would amount to a disposal of land under Town and Country Planning Act 1990, if so there was an obligation on T to require the best consideration which could reasonably be obtained
650			_aBALED REFUSE
650			_aHIGH-DENSITY BALING
650			_aINFILLING
650			_aLANDFILL SITES
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aREINSTATEMENT
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S233
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c46943 _d46943