| 000 | 01127cab a2200301 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS50164 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u74457 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aPool, A. | ||
| 245 | _aPitch fee reviews | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(9408) 26 February 1994, 102-103(2) |
||
| 520 | _aExposes a weakness in mobile homes legislation, which allowed a CA decision ("Stroud v Weir Associates Ltd" 1987) which precluded the use of open market evidence in the valuation of a pitch fee for a review. Discusses arbitration methods and how park owners have strengthened their position. | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 650 | _aMOBILE HOME ACT 1975 | ||
| 650 | _aMOBILE HOME ACT 1983 | ||
| 650 | _aMOBILE HOME PARKS | ||
| 650 | _aMOBILE HOMES | ||
| 650 | _aPITCH FEES | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 650 | _aSECURITY OF TENURE | ||
| 650 |
_aValuation _96273 |
||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c46964 _d46964 |
||