| 000 | 01026cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS50208 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u74613 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRhone v Stephens | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1994) 67 P&CR 9-17(9) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 15 January 1993. The court examined the construction of the original conveyance to establish the ownership of a roof and the onus of a repairing covenant. The covenant could not be enforced by principle of benefit and burden and "Austerberry v Oldham Corporation" (1885) was cited. | ||
| 650 | _aBENEFIT AND BURDEN | ||
| 650 | _aCONVEYANCE | ||
| 650 | _aCOVENANTS | ||
| 650 | _aEASEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aESTOPPEL | ||
| 650 | _aLEAKAGE | ||
| 650 | _aREPAIRS | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING ELEMENTS-COMPLETE BUILDING ELEMENTS-ROOFS | ||
| 650 | _aTITO V WADDELL | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c47022 _d47022 |
||