000			01024cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS53978
008			090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u7743
041			_aeng
100			_aRedler, A.
245			_aApplicant is put through the mill in land access case
260			_c1995
350			_a0
490			_aProperty Week _v53(8) 23 November 1995, 26-27(2)
520			_aConsiders the case of "Coulton v Pickles", a dispute over compensation for access to erect scaffolding on neighbouring land to repair a rear wall. The fact that the rear wall belonged to a property that had once been a mill meant that the issue of consideration applied and the neighbours had the right to demand money for inconvenience.
650			_aACCESS TO NEIGHBOURING LAND ACT 1992
650			_aCOMPENSATION
650			_aCONSIDERATION
650			_aCOULTON V PICKLES
650			_aNUISANCE
650			_aREPAIRS
690			_aHIGHWAYS RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c4709 _d4709