| 000 | 00917cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3104-21 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u75096 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aToo many experts | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aTimes _v25 January 1995, 38(1) |
||
| 520 | _a"Rawlinson v Westbrook and another" CA 8 December 1994, following disputed entitlement to fees for an expert witness, "held" that the Rules of the Supreme Court should be revised to permit judges the right to refuse expert evidence, in order to protect litigants from unnecessary expense. | ||
| 650 | _aEXPERT EVIDENCE | ||
| 650 | _aEXPERT WITNESSES | ||
| 650 | _aFEES | ||
| 650 | _aRAWLINSON V WESTBROOK AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aRULES OF THE SUPREME COURT | ||
| 690 | _aLAW | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c47312 _d47312 |
||