| 000 | 01316cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS50363 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u75441 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aMatrix-Securities Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aAll England Law Reports _v(1994) 1 AllER 769-793(25) |
||
| 520 | _aHL 17 February 1994. M were sponsors of a scheme to develop an enterprise zone property. Under this scheme, it was proposed that a unit trust would be formed to acquire the freehold, and also purchase some property. When M applied to Inland Revenue, for further details and reassurance on the scheme, they failed to provide a full and accurate disclosure for clearance on the matter. IR Inspectors then withdrew their clearance. The issue was whether or not they were fair in their withdrawal and whether this amounted to abuse of power. Held, IR were fully justified in their course of action, since they had no other choice. Appeal dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aCAPITAL ALLOWANCES ACT 1990 S 10A | ||
| 650 | _aCAPITAL ALLOWANCES | ||
| 650 | _aENTERPRISE ZONES | ||
| 650 | _aINCOME TAX | ||
| 650 | _aMATRIX-SECURITIES LTD | ||
| 650 | _aTAX AVOIDANCE SCHEME | ||
| 690 | _aTAXATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c47493 _d47493 |
||