| 000 | 01213cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS50372 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u75467 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aSoS Environment v Euston Centre Investments Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aWeekly Law Reports _v1994 1 WLR 563-570(8) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 9 December 1993. Application by landlord to strike out tenant`s proceedings for leave to appeal from arbitral award in a rent review case under Arbitration Act 1979 s1(3)(b) within 21 days as required under RSC Ord 73 r 5 on the grounds that the hearing had been delayed. Held that as there had been failure to prosecute the appeal with speedy despatch, the tenant`s proceedings would be struck out for want of prosecution. "Birkett v James" test considered. Landlord`s appeal allowed. | ||
| 650 | _aSOS ENVIRONMENT V EUSTON CENTRE INVESTMENTS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATION AWARDS | ||
| 650 | _aDELAY | ||
| 650 | _aFAILURE TO PROSECUTE | ||
| 650 | _aLEAVE TO APPEAL | ||
| 650 | _aWANT OF PROSECUTION | ||
| 690 | _aARBITRATION-CASE LAW | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c47504 _d47504 |
||