| 000 | 01458cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS37966 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u7821 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aCity and Metropolitan Properties Ltd v Greycroft Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1987 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v283(6342) 11 July 1987, 199-205(3) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 23 January 1987. Action by tenants (T) claiming damages against landlords (L) for losses sustained whilst tenants of a flat. When T acquired the lease in 1982 L were in serious breach of the repairing covenant . T commenced their present action in August 1984, the writ originally claiming specific performance of the covenant. The repairs were not carried out until December 1984, by which time T had assigned the lease. T amended the writ to claim consequential damages sustained while they were tenants. L put forward two defences: 1) when T assigned the lease, all rights in respect of it passed to the assignees, including any right to damages 2) the heads of damages were too remote; T had purchased the flat as a speculation for early resale at a profit. ChD rejected the first defence, holding that L`s liability to T for existing breaches was capable of surviving the assignment in the same way as T`s liability to the landlord. Held also, with regard to the second defence, that in pr | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c4758 _d4758 |
||