000			01476cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS37968
008			090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u7825
041			_aeng
245			_aKumar v Dunning and Another
260			_c1987
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v283(6341) 4 July 1987, 59-64(5)
520			_aCA 15 April 1987. Appeal by original lessee against decision dismissing claim to recover money due from the defendant sureties in reimbursement of payments made for an underlease of business premises. The plaintiff(P) had assigned the unexpired residue of underlease to a company which went into liquidation owing rent and other sums. The licence to make the assignment was made between the then lessor, the lessee, the plaintiff underlessee, the assignee and the defendant sureties. Neither the assignee nor the sureties entered into any direct covenant with (P). It was accepted both, that (P) was liable to pay the rent to the assignees of the reversion on the default of the assignees of the underlease and also, having paid the rent, was subrogate to any rights the assignees of the reversion had against the sureties . At issue was whether assignees of the reversion were entitled to recover rent from the sureties. Having rejected three of the arguments put forward by (P) claiming that the
650			_aSUBROGATION
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c4761 _d4761