| 000 | 01206cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3040-58 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u75857 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBasis of consent | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1994) EGCS 154 (22/10/94) |
||
| 520 | _a"Challock Parish Council v Shirley and others" ChD 12 October 1994. Disputed rights of access over a verge in 1988 were settled by consent order. Para 8 of the order required S to pay a percentage of the difference in value when the subject land was developed as in "Stokes v Cambridge". In 1993 the land was sold for development and S sought judicial definition of development gain for the purposes of para 8. Held that the serviced plot basis of valuation be adjusted. | ||
| 650 | _aACCESS | ||
| 650 | _aCHALLOCK PARISH COUNCIL V SHIRLEY AND OTHERS | ||
| 650 | _aDEVELOPMENT GAIN | ||
| 650 | _aOUTLINE PLANNING CONSENT | ||
| 650 | _aRIGHTS OF ACCESS | ||
| 650 | _aSERVICED PLOT BASIS | ||
| 650 | _aSTOKES V CAMBRIDGE | ||
| 650 | _aVALUATION ISSUES | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c47723 _d47723 |
||