000			01139cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS50462
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u75892
041			_aeng
245			_aDeakins v Hookings
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(1994) 14 EG 133-138(6)
520			_aLondon County Court 24 September 1993. Appeal by D for an injunction, or alternatively damages for wrongful interference with a right of light, by H. Held, there had been an actionable interference to right to light in one of the rooms; a mandatory injunction would be granted as D`s loss had been serious enough to justify the inconvenience and expense in removing the interference to light. If the case was to proceed further, the judge assessed damages he would award as an alternative to a mandatory injunction: £45,000, being 15% of the benefit of the development to H.
650			_aDAMAGES
650			_aEASEMENTS
650			_aINJUNCTIONS
650			_aINTERFERENCE
650			_aRIGHTS TO LIGHT
690			_aHIGHWAYS AND RIGHTS OF WAY-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c47743 _d47743