000			01040cab a2200181 4500
001			WB2527-18
008			090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u75992
041			_aeng
245			_aLicence or tenancy ?
260			_c1989
350			_a0
490			_aEGCS _v1989 98
520			_aAslan v Murphy (no 1) and (no 2) , Wynne and another v Duke CA 27 June 1989). Three cases in which the court decided that the words in the agreement between parties, which gave rise to licence e status were in fact a pretence and the appellants had exclusive occupancy and therefore were tenants protected under the Rent Acts Aslan v Murphy (No 1) and Murphy (No 2) , Wynne v Duke CA 27 June 1989. Three cases in which the court decided that the works in the agreement between parties, which gave rise to licencee status were in fact a pretence and the appellants had exclusive occupancy and therefore were tenants protected under the Rent Acts .
690			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c47813 _d47813