000			01123cab a2200265 4500
001			WB3008-30
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u76163
041			_aeng
245			_aCovenant
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1994 EGCS 20 (19/2/94)
520			_a"Green and another v Carter" CA 1 February 1994 questioned whether a restrictive covenant, that lower apartment of a property should be used as a single private residence, applied to outbuildings which the appellant wanted to develop. Held that outbuildings such as the games and laundry rooms intended for domestic use were covered by the covenant; others such as the stable designed for non-domestic use did not. Right of way to stable block determined.
650			_aDOMESTIC USE
650			_aNON-DOMESTIC USE
650			_aOUTBUILDINGS
650			_aRESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
650			_aRIGHT OF WAY
650			_aSINGLE PRIVATE RESIDENCE
650			_aSTABLES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c47924 _d47924