000			01024cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS50534
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u76365
041			_aeng
245			_aRhone and another v Stephens
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v1994 2 WLR 429-438(11)
520			_aHL 17 March 1994. In dismissing the appeal by the plaintiffs to enforce the restrictive covenant to repair the roof, it was held that although negative covenants are enforcable against freeholders, positive ones against successors in title under common law are not. "Austerberry v Oldham Corporation" (1865) principle confirmed.
650			_aAUSTERBERRY V OLDHAM CORPORATION
650			_aFREEHOLD LAND
650			_aNEGATIVE COVENANTS
650			_aPOSITIVE COVENANTS
650			_aRESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
650			_aSUCCESSORS IN TITLE
650			_aVENDOR AND PURCHASER
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c48045 _d48045