000			01193cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS36885
008			090401t1986 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u865
041			_aeng
100			_aGuthrie, T.
245			_aDamage to neighbouring property : wrongful acts of third parties
260			_c1986
300			_aSee Abstracts 33203, 36257)
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v279(6301) 13 September 1986, 1065(1)
520			_aLiability for the wrongful acts of third parties in relation to neighbouring properties has recently been the subject of two different conclusions in the courts. In Perl ( Exporters) Ltd v Camden London Borough Council (1983), the CA considered that as a matter of principle no such liability could arise (with certain exceptions). In a Scottish case Thomas Graham and Co v Church of Scotland General Trustees (1982) the sherriff took the view that such libility could arise. In this article, the author looks at the implications of two recent cases, Squires v Perth and Kinross DC and King v Liverpool City Council where this distinction has continued.
690			_aPROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c481 _d481