000			01085cab a2200229 4500
001			ABS54023
008			090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u7930
041			_aeng
245			_aLittle v Courage Ltd
260			_c1995
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1995) 70 P&CR 469-479(11)
520			_aCA 21 December 1994. Little (L) wanted to exercise the option in his lease to renew for a further five years, Courage (C) agreed. However C later claimed that L had not submitted a business plan with his application, as required in the lease and his application was therefore refused. Held that L had only to `agree` to a plan, not submit one, so if C did not present L with a plan to sign C could not refuse L`s application to extend the lease on the grounds of there being no business plan attached.
650			_aBUSINESS AGREEMENTS
650			_aBUSINESS PLANS
650			_aLEASE RENEWAL
650			_aPUBLIC HOUSES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c4827 _d4827