| 000 | 01127cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS54025 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u7942 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aBailey and Bailey v Supasnaps Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1995) 70 P&CR 450-458(9) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 17 May 1995. An appeal against the decision that the lessors` rent review notice dated 9 October 1991 had not been served in time was allowed. The confusion surrounded the fact that the lease stated the period of notice should be `a clear period of two quarters`, the appeal judge argued that the rental period expired at the very last moment of 23 June 1992 (one of the quarter days) so provided a notice was served before 24 December 1991 it was in fact valid. | ||
| 650 | _aBAILEY AND BAILEY V SUPASNAPS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aNOTICE PERIOD | ||
| 650 | _aOPEN MARKET RENT | ||
| 650 | _aQUARTER DAYS | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 650 | _aTIME LIMITS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c4834 _d4834 |
||