| 000 | 01406cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X77357 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u77357 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aDollar Land (Cumbernauld) Ltd v CIN Properties Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aScots Law Times _v1997 SLT 260-279(20) |
||
| 520 | _aExtra Division. Lords Sutherland, Cullen and Rodger. 25 April 1996. Process - res judicata and competent and omitted - previous case with same parties in House of Lords on question of whether irritancy clause could be enforced - subsequent action in Court of Session dealing with whether irritancy clause governed matters so as to exclude claim for unjustified enrichment - whether identity of subject matter - whether pursuers should have raised claim as defence to previous action. Recompensse - irritancy of lease - rent payable agreed percentage of rents received by tenant from subtenants - subjects of lease developed and operated by landlord and predecessors of tenant - landlord enforcing irritancy clause for non-payment of rent - tenant claiming in respect of loss of entitlement to share in income from development - whether landlord unjustifiably enriched - whether tenant entitled to recompense. | ||
| 650 | _aCOMMERCIAL LEASES | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c25/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c48634 _d48634 |
||