| 000 | 01061cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS56671 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u77421 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aFoley, R. | ||
| 245 | _aDefective reasoning | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v267(7981) 14 March 1997, 41(1) |
||
| 520 | _aAsks whether "Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth" decision is relevant to commercial contracts. The case reaffirmed the principle that while cost of rectification is generally the right measure of damage for defective work, that rule will not apply where the cost of remedial work is disproportionate to the end to be achieved. | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGE | ||
| 650 | _aDEFECTIVE WORK | ||
| 650 | _aFREEMAN V MOHAMMED NIROOMAND | ||
| 650 | _aMEASURE OF DAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aRECTIFICATION | ||
| 650 | _aRUXLEY ELECTRONICS AND CONSTRUCTION LTD V FORSYTH | ||
| 650 | _aTECHNICAL DEFECT | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING PATHOLOGY | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c26/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c48677 _d48677 |
||