| 000 | 00853cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3313-40 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u77432 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRetail development | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[1997] EGCS 39 (22/3/97) |
||
| 520 | _a"Best and others v SoS Environment and others", QBD 5 March 1997. Examines whether an inspector approving an appeal site for a new superstore in a market town failed to adhere to `sequential approach` urged in the revised PPG6. | ||
| 650 | _aBEST AND OTHERS V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND BASS HOLDINGS LTD | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING POLICY GUIDANCE NOTE SIX | ||
| 650 | _aSEQUENTIAL APPROACH | ||
| 650 | _aSUPERSTORE | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c26/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c48686 _d48686 |
||