000			01089cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS56803
008			090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u77779
041			_aeng
100			_aDonohoe, S.W.
245		4	_aThe use of formulae in head office overhead claims in building contracts
260			_c1997
350			_a0
490			_aCampus Construction _vMarch 1997, 14-16(3)
520			_aAssesses the effectiveness of using formulae in head office overhead claims in building contracts. Looks at the Hudson formula, the Emden formula and the Eichleay formula. Concludes that claims based on formulae are being phased out following the decision in "Alfred McAlpine Homes North Ltd v Property and Land Contractors Ltd".
650			_aALFRED MCALPINE HOMES NORTH LTD V PROPERTY AND LAND CONTRACTORS
650			_aCONTRACT CLAIMS
650			_aEICHLEAY FORMULA
650			_aEMDEN FORMULA
650			_aHEAD OFFICE OVERHEADS
650			_aHUDSON FORMULA
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
942			_n0
948			_c17/04/1997
999			_c48897 _d48897