| 000 | 00951cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS56830 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u77934 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aMynors, C. | ||
| 245 | _aDemolition or alteration | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aSolicitors` Journal _v141(14) 11 April 1997, 324-325(2) |
||
| 520 | _aExplains why the decision in "Shimizu v Westminster CC" may have a considerable impact on the appearance of historic towns and villages. The case concerned the removal of a chimney breast from a listed building. | ||
| 650 | _aALTERATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aCONSERVATION AREAS | ||
| 650 | _aDEMOLITION | ||
| 650 | _aLISTED BUILDING CONSENT | ||
| 650 | _aLISTED BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING AND COMPENSATION ACT 1991 | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aSHIMIZU V WESTMINSTER CC | ||
| 690 | _aCONSERVATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c25/04/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c49010 _d49010 |
||