| 000 | 01019cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS56915 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u77937 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aPenfold, B. | ||
| 245 | _aShopping centres: rating problems | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aSolicitors` Journal _v141(14) 11 April 1997, 341(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the decision in "Hodgkinson (VO) v Strathclyde Regional Superannuation Fund" which highlighted concerns regarding consistency of treatment of landlords` parts and common parts in shopping developments and which has since resulted in an agreement being reached on the principles determining rateability in such situations. | ||
| 650 | _aCAR PARKS | ||
| 650 | _aHODGKINSON VO V STRATHCLYDE RC SUPERANNUATION FUND | ||
| 650 | _aPUBLIC TOILETS | ||
| 650 | _aRATEABILITY | ||
| 650 | _aSHOPPING CENTRES | ||
| 650 | _aVALUATION OFFICE AGENCY | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c25/04/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c49012 _d49012 |
||