000			01663cab a2200241 4500
001			ABS38010
008			090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u8067
041			_aeng
245			_aLondon Merchant Securities plc and Trendworthy Two Ltd v Islington LBC
260			_c1987
350			_a0
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v(1987) 3 WLR 173-188(16)
520			_aHL 20 May 1987. Ratepayers`(R) appeal from CA decision allowing only in part their appeal from a cc decision which dismissed their appeal against a completion notice served by the rating authority relating to the Angel Centre . The completion notice stated the property would be treated as completed on 1 September 1983. R had appealed to cc on the grounds that the building could not reasonably be expected to be completed by then. Cc held, dismissing the appeal, that by March 1983 the building was substantially complete and that works customarily done after substantial completion could reasonably be carried out within six months. On appeal, CA held allowing the appeal that upon the evidence before him the judge could not properly have come to the conclusion he did on the time reasonably required for fitting out . R appealed to HL on the grounds which failed in CA. HL held, in determining the starting date for the customary works, it was necessary to determine when the building was comp
650			_aCOMPLETION NOTICES
650			_aGENERAL RATE ACT 1967 S17
650			_aSUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED
650			_aTRENDWORTHY TWO LIMITED
650			_aUNOCCUPIED PROPERTY
690			_aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c4917 _d4917