| 000 | 01061cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3320-09 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u78447 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aTUPE - employee protection | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aSolicitors` Journal _v14 March 1997, 224; 4 April 1997, 296 |
||
| 490 |
_aFinancial Times _v19 May 1997, 6(3) |
||
| 520 | _a"Betts v Brintel Helicopters" is the first UK case to consider the ECJ decision in "Suzen v Zehnacker". The ECJ held that the EU Acquired Rights directive implemented in UK law by the TUPE Regulations 1991 did not automatically apply when contracted services changed from one provider to another. Contractors are seeking new legislation to protect employee rights. | ||
| 650 | _aBETTS V BRINTEL HELICOPTERS | ||
| 650 | _aSUZEN V ZEHNACKER BEBAUDEREINIGUNG GMBH KRANKENHAUSSERVICE | ||
| 650 | _aTRANSFER OF UNDERTAKINGS REGULATIONS 1991 | ||
| 650 | _aTUPE REGULATIONS | ||
| 690 | _aECONOMIC AND SOCIAL | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c21/05/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c49356 _d49356 |
||