000			01727cab a2200289 4500
001			ABS57015
008			090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u78503
041			_aeng
245			_aElitestone Ltd v Morris and another
260			_c1997
350			_a0
490			_aAll England Law Reports _v[1997] 2 All ER 513-525(13)
520			_aHL 1 May 1997. The plaintiffs (E) were freehold owners of a parcel of land divided into lots. The defendants (M) occupied a bungalow on one lot. The bungalow rested on concrete foundation blocks in the ground. E wished to redevelop the land and issued proceedings against the occupiers. M resisted on the grounds that they were protected by the Rent Act 1977. The assistant recorder held that the bungalow had become annexed to and part of the realty and that the defendants were statutory tenants. The CA allowed E`s appeal holding that the bungalow was a chattel because it merely rested on the foundation blocks, and so was not included in the tenancy of the lot. M appealed to the House of Lords. Their appeal was allowed on the grounds that when a house was built in such a way that it could not be removed except by demolition, it could not have been intended to remain a chattel and must have been intended to form part of the realty. Decision of the CA reversed.
650			_aBUNGALOW
650			_aCHATTELS
650			_aDEMOLITION
650			_aELITESTONE LTD V MORRIS AND ANOTHER
650			_aFIXTURES
650			_aPHYSICAL ATTACHMENT
650			_aPROTECTED TENANT
650			_aRENT ACT 1977
650			_aSTATUTORY TENANTS
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c22/05/1997
999			_c49392 _d49392