| 000 | 01267cab a2200361 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS54047 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u8103 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aHambleton, R. | ||
| 245 | _aLessons from the empowerment zone | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aPlanning Week _v3(44) 2 November 1995, 18-19; 3(45) 9 November 199 |
||
| 520 | _aDescribes how the UK model of local authorities competing for central government funds has been exported to the US where deprived areas compete for designation as an `empowerment zone` that will attract additional funding. The second article looks at US models in urban management. | ||
| 650 | _aEMPOWERMENT ZONES | ||
| 650 | _aFUNDING COMPETITION | ||
| 650 | _aGOVERNMENT PRINCIPLES | ||
| 650 | _aHESELTINE PAPER | ||
| 650 | _aMAYORAL GOVERNMENT | ||
| 650 | _aRURAL EMPOWERMENT ZONES | ||
| 650 | _aUNITED STATES | ||
| 650 | _aURBAN EMPOWERMENT ZONES | ||
| 650 | _aURBAN ENHANCED ENTERPRISE COMMUNITIES | ||
| 650 | _aURBAN MANAGEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aURBAN POLICY | ||
| 650 | _aURBAN REGENERATION | ||
| 650 | _aURBAN SUPPLEMENTAL ZONES | ||
| 690 | _aOVERSEAS-NORTH AMERICA | ||
| 690 | _aURBAN RENEWAL | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c4941 _d4941 |
||