000			01775cab a2200277 4500
001			ABS57016
008			090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u78674
041			_aeng
245			_aHunter and others v Canary Wharf Ltd; Hunter and others v London Docklands Development Corporation
260			_c1997
350			_a0
490			_aAll England Law Reports _v[1997] 2 All ER 426-470(22)
520			_aHL 24 April 1997. Two separate appeals heard together. First appeal, whether interference with television reception from the defendant`s (C) tower block enabled the plaintiff`s (H) to sue in private nuisance. In the second appeal (H) claimed damages in nuisance against the defendant (L) in respect of deposits of dust on their properties caused by construction of a link road. CA ruled for (C) in the first action and for (H) in the second action (the dust action), reversing both the original rulings. The HL held that interference with television reception was not capable of constituting an actionable private nuisance, as an owner is free to build on his own land, subject to planning control. In the second action, HL stated that a person who has no right over land affected by a nuisance cannot bring an action in private nuisance. Appeal of plaintiffs in "Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd." dismissed. Appeal of defendants in "Hunter v London Docklands Development Corp." allowed.
650			_aCONSTRUCTION WORK
650			_aDUST
650			_aHUNTER & OTHERS V LONDON DOCKLANDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
650			_aHUNTER AND OTHERS V CANARY WHARF LTD
650			_aINTERFERENCE
650			_aNUISANCE
650			_aPRIVATE NUISANCE
650			_aTELEVISION RECEPTION
690			_aLAW
942			_n0
948			_c30/05/1997
999			_c49476 _d49476