| 000 | 00859cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS57173 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u78885 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aSuzen judgment creates fresh uncertainty on `relevant transfers | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aFacilities Management _v4(5) June 1997, 16-17(2) |
||
| 520 | _aThe judgment in "Ayse Suzen v Zehnacker" creates fresh uncertainties as to what is a `relevant transfer` for the purposes of TUPE. Considers the background to the decision highlighting relevant parts of the judgment with guidance on how employers should protect themselves when outsourcing contracts. | ||
| 650 | _aACQUIRED RIGHTS DIRECTIVE | ||
| 650 | _aAYSE SUZEN V ZEHNACKER | ||
| 650 | _aTUPE REGULATIONS | ||
| 690 | _aLAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c11/06/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c49581 _d49581 |
||