| 000 | 00962cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3324-25 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u79039 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aLandlord and tenant | ||
| 260 | _c1997 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[1997] EGCS 87 (14/6/97) |
||
| 520 | _a"Mustafa v Ruddock" CA 5 June 1997. Assured tenancy which would have been assured shorthold, but for estate agent`s error. Plaintiff brought proceedings for possession on grounds that home needed for himself and family. Held not equitable to dispense with notice requirement, as no indication had been given at beginning of tenancy. Plaintiff appealed. Appeal allowed. | ||
| 650 | _aASSURED SHORTHOLD TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aASSURED TENANCY | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING ACT 1988 | ||
| 650 | _aPOSSESSION | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c19/06/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c49658 _d49658 |
||